Navy League Web
Redesign in Progress!
 
April 2003 Join Now

Australia Updates Defense Plan To Counter Changing Threats

By AMI INTERNATIONAL

AMI International, Inc., Bremerton, Wash., is an international consulting and naval intelligence services company located on the Web at amiinter.com.

The Australian Ministry of Defence has released an update to its White Paper titled Defence 2000: Our Future Defence Force, which was released in 2001. The update titled, A Defence Update 2003, acknowledges the changing strategic environment over the past two years. The update--released on 26 February 2003--now accents global terrorism and the threat of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) as new threats that Australia must take into consideration.

The new document also suggests that the Australia Armed Forces in their current form will remain the same; however, added capabilities will be developed to respond to the new challenges of terrorism and WMDs through close cooperation with allies, and that these threats will be faced on a world-wide scale. The document also suggests that the armed forces will have to grow in size to continue with their current missions in the region as well as adding the capabilities for countering future threats.

Australian defense officials said that all of the procurement initiatives (71 total) under the Defence 2000 plan were approved and funded, but made the point that future major initiatives such as the Joint Strike Fighter and Anti-Air Warfare Destroyer Program will not be approved for a number of years. Defence may believe it has a window of several years to fund (and possibly increase funding) the changes required to field the additional capabilities to meet the changing threats as envisaged under the 2003 update.

Australia will require large naval units in order to operate globally to meet the new threat. If anything, the changing threat further justifies the Royal Australian Navy's requirement for new Anti-Air Warfare destroyers as well as new amphibious transport ships and replenishment vessels to support the force far from home.

Canadian Navy Faces Procurement Shortfalls

Recent documentation and press coverage continues to reveal that the Canadian Navy (CN) is desperately short of funds, raising the possibility that it will be unable to fulfill its global responsibilities. Current planning calls for funds to be diverted away from important procurement and modernization plans for all the services to fund current operations, which are continuing to increase. The CN also is faced with increased ship deployments at a time when overall defense funding is in decline

In late 2002, the Prime Minister, Chief of Defense Staff, leading Parliamentarians, and Canadian defense experts, made it clear to the Canadian public that action would be needed in the near future, resulting in a larger increase for the 2003 defense budget and beyond. In 2003, the Canadian Armed Forces will enjoy its largest single defense budget increase in a decade.

Funding for 2003 provides the Department of National Defense (DND) with $1.6 billion in new funding in each of the next two fiscal years, and with a sustained annual level of $800 million thereafter. In addition, the Canadian government has renewed its commitment to reassess the future needs of defense following a review of Canada's foreign and defense policy.

The DND has stated that the influx of additional funds will permit the Canadian forces to address the following shortfalls:

* Continue to support ongoing recruiting and training programs;

* Restock spare parts and ease pressure on the defense budget for operational support;

* Support and enhance Canada's reserves;

* Buy new equipment and modernize capabilities in selected areas;

* Address pressing infrastructure maintenance and replacement needs; and

* Ease pressure on Canada's Navy, Army, and Air Force operations both at home and abroad.

As evidenced by the DND's priorities, the annual increases will be used as a catch-up budget for the shortfalls of the past decade as well as future operations and maintenance. It is hardly enough funding for any significant procurement effort. Most of the funding for 2003 will probably be utilized for increased operations including the task force that was recently sent to the Persian Gulf (Operation Apollo).

Defense Cutbacks Strike German Navy

The German Defense Minister has announced major changes regarding ongoing weapons programs and the reorganization of the Federal Armed Forces. With a projected annual defense budget of $24.6 billion from 2003 through 2006, the German government expects to save at least $3.46 billion. For the Navy, the announcement mentioned that adequate numbers of advanced DM2 A4 torpedoes would be procured for the first four Type 212 submarines, as well as unspecified decommissionings of ships and craft.

The Ministry of Defense later specified the ships and craft to be decommissioned as being the ten units of the Albatros-class fast attack craft (FAC). All ten units will be decommissioned by 2005, and will become prime candidates for transfer to other navies. Although commissioned in the 1970s, these craft could be quite useful to new Baltic NATO members including Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia, as well as to Black Sea NATO members including Romania and Bulgaria. In addition, NATO aspirants such as Ukraine may also be interested in a Western FAC force.

Portugal Seeks Proposals For New Submarine

The Portuguese Government has announced that it is seeking new proposals for its submarine program.

Portugal, which is strapped for cash, announced that it is reducing its purchase from three to two submarines in order to realize savings but now also is looking for additional benefits not included in the last offers. Proposals are expected to include better prices for new submarines and economic benefits, as well as new a new demand for used vessels to satisfy the Navy's subsurface requirements as the new boats would now be commissioned well after the present submarines are to scheduled to be decommissioned.

The two prospective suppliers, the German Submarine Consortium and DCN International, responded to the initial request for proposals in 1998 and--after being down-selected--submitted their revised bids in summer 2000. A sufficient budget was never appropriated and the offerors have worked strenuously to find a financing solution only to run into elections and a brand new government in April 2002, which took the project back to the financial drawing board and has now reduced the purchase from three to two submarines.

Portugal has begun a serious reappraisal of the mission requirements of its Navy, with the primary objective now being identified as the protection of the economic exclusion zone (EEZ). This transition will accent the need for more offshore patrol vessels (OPVs) and fewer surface combatants and submarines. Perhaps most importantly, the government has recognized that the cost of new ships exceeds its naval budget and that it will be acquiring ships from the used ship market.

DCN International initially offered three Scorpene submarines for $1.89 billion and the German offer was for two Type 214 submarines for approximately $2.25 billion, with both parties offering economic incentives. With Portugal's worsening economic situation, in which the nation is now facing a 4.1 percent of GDP deficit ($6.6 billion), the government is attempting to get the best deal it can while modernizing its naval force. *

Back to Top
Home | About Us | Contact Us | Links | Online Community
U.S.Navy | U.S. Marine Corps | U.S. Coast Guard | U.S.Flag Merchant Marine
Membership | Ways of Giving | Meeting & Events | Public Relations
E-Store | Legislative Affairs | Navy League Councils | Naval Sea Cadets
Scholarship Program | Sea Power Magazine | Search