Military, Maritime, Multimission, and More
James H. Thach III
JAMES H. THACH III is a retired aerospace
program manager and the past chairman of the Navy League's Active and
Reserve Affairs Committee.
When Hurricane Floyd ravaged the U.S. East Coast in September 1999,
leaving thousands of Americans flooded out of their homes and businesses,
the United States Coast Guard was again ready to protect life and property.
At 9:15 p.m. on 16 September, Coast Guard Air Station Elizabeth City,
N.C., was advised by the Coast Guard's Fifth District Rescue Coordination
Center that "hundreds of individuals" were stranded "on
rooftops, in cars, on highways, in trees, and in rivers" in the
vicinity of Tarboro, N.C. The Air Station assumed the role of on-scene
commander for the rescue efforts around Tarboro. An HC-130H was launched
to provide airborne command and control. The U.S. Navy sent an E-2C Hawkeye
equipped with airborne radar to provide an accurate picture of all the
aircraft operating in and around the area; the Coast Guard and other
services provided aircraft for the recovery operations. Ground stations
were set up on-scene and manned by personnel from Air Station Elizabeth
City to allow immediate communications for the evacuation being planned.
The Coast Guard also forward-deployed its Transportable Communications
Center, which played an invaluable role by serving as a direct link between
officials on the ground and the on-scene commander. Rescue Coordination
Center personnel worked closely with local officials to provide expert
advice.
Every type of Coast Guard aircraft was called into service. Seven Coast
Guard and 12 Department of Defense (DOD) facilities provided aircraft
and personnel. The aircraft came from as far away as Clearwater, Fla.,
and Traverse City, Mich. Over the next 42 hours, during which the Coast
Guard headed the recovery operations, more than 2,200 lives were saved
or directly assisted. Coast Guard aircraft flew over 350 flight hours
and saved 450 people. Navy, Army, and Marine components flew a collective
total of more than 450 hours and recovered an astounding 1,800 people.
DOD heavy-lift helicopters were able to transport large numbers in the
same aircraft, and at one point evacuated an entire community in a single
flight.
While this is an extraordinary case, it is what the American people
have come to expect of the U.S. Coast Guard--but saving lives is only
one of the numerous missions assigned to the Coast Guard throughout its
long and sometimes complex history.
The Early Years
That history started in 1790, when the United States Congress, under
the direction of Alexander Hamilton, then Secretary of the Treasury,
established the Revenue Cutter Service and gave it the specific task
of collecting the customs and tonnage duties that were sorely needed
by the new nation. Congress also authorized 10 cutters, each to be manned
by an "Officer of Customs" and a crew of not more than 15 personnel
in operations along the Atlantic seaboard. In 1797, the Congress further
strengthened the military character of the Revenue Cutter Service by
assigning it the responsibility of defending the nation's sea coasts
and countering any hostility to U.S. vessels and/or commerce. In 1799
the Congress formally made the Revenue Cutter Service a military organization
by statute and provided that the Service would, in time of war--or whenever
else the president might direct--cooperate with the U.S. Navy, which
itself had been reestablished one year earlier. Within its first 10 years,
therefore, the organization that was to become the United States Coast
Guard was created for maritime purposes and as a military organization.
The U.S. Coast Guard retains those two key characteristics today. It
is a military and maritime force in all respects.
The multimission character of the service developed quickly. In 1807
the first lifesaving station was established in Cohasset, Mass., and
1818 saw the building of the first lighthouse on the Great Lakes. Manning
and maintaining both types of facilities would later become major responsibilities
of the Coast Guard.
The Service fought, and fought gallantly, in the War of 1812. One encounter
underscores the zeal and fortitude with which the Revenue Cutter Service
defended the United States. On 12 June 1813, Stephen Evans reports in
his The United States Coast Guard, 17901915, the cutter Surveyor
was anchored in New York harbor. Manned by only 15 men, she was attacked
by a boarding party of 50 Englishmen from the frigate Narcissus. Outnumbered
and surrounded, the cutter's crew defended their deck foot by foot until
it was clear to her commanding officer that further resistance would
result in useless loss of life. Only then did he surrender. In the brief
and bloody battle five cutter men and seven British were wounded, and
three British were killed. The following day, the captain of the Narcissus
sent a note expressing his admiration for the gallantry with which the
American crew had defended the Surveyor. In short, the spirit and dedication
of the Coast Guard was established very early, and set a standard that
endures to the present.
A Proliferation of Missions
By the 1850s there were several additional responsibilities that would
later be assigned to the Coast Guard: enforcement of the Neutrality Laws
of 1818, for example, the suppression of piracy on the high seas, the
protection of timber reserves in Florida, and the suppression of the
slave trade. The creation of the Steamboat Service within the Department
of Justice, the formal assignment of the Revenue Cutters to search and
rescue, the establishment of the Bureau of Navigation within the Treasury,
and the establishment of the Revenue Marine Bureau within the Treasury
Department added other duties. In addition, the revenue cutters were
formally assigned to the search-and-rescue (SAR) mission, and the Bureau
of Navigation and the Revenue Marine Bureau both were established within
the Treasury Department.
During the several intervening decades before the Coast Guard was formally
established under that name in 1915, the various agencies that would
later merge into it acquired numerous additional maritime responsibilities:
the building and operation of additional lifesaving stations, the enforcement
of immigration laws, and law enforcement in the newly acquired territory
of Alaska. A School of Instruction was established in 1877 for the training
of cadets, the Life Saving Service became part of the Treasury Department,
navigation and anchorage requirements were introduced, and the Collectors
of Customs were integrated into the Revenue Cutter Service. The protection
of fisheries in federal waters and the enforcement of motor boat regulations
became yet additional missions. The Bering Sea Patrol was created to
protect endangered fur seals. Finally, the International Ice Patrol was
created after the tragic loss of the Titanic in 1912.
In short, by 1915 the "new" Service already had assumed responsibility
for the management and protection of virtually all waters bordering the
United States. The Coast Guard's multi-mission character was thus firmly
established.
Since 1915, the Service's maritime responsibilities have continued to
grow and expand. Responsibility for detecting against coastal pollution
was added as early as 1924, and was significantly expanded later (in
1990). Icebreaking was another duty assigned to the Coast Guard. All
maritime navigation facilities and systems, from lighthouses to LORAN
(long-range aid to navigation), also became USCG responsibilities. The
Coast Guard Auxiliary, a voluntary nonmilitary organization created to
promote boating safety, was established in 1939; the Coast Guard Reserve
was created only two years later. During World War II the Coast Guard
reported to the U.S. Navy, and distinguished itself on virtually every
combat front.
Statements Clear and True
After the war the Coast Guard once more came under the Treasury Department.
In January 1948 Congress mandated the first detailed and independent
study of the roles and missions of the Coast Guard. That study was completed
over 50 years ago, but provides a worthwhile perspective on the current
review of the Coast Guard's roles and missions. The purpose of the independent
study established by Public Law No. 299 of the 80th Congress was simply
stated as: "Review the functions, policies, operations, and procedures
of the Coast Guard, promoting efficiency and cost savings." The
scope of work included a detailed analysis of operations carried out
at Coast Guard Headquarters in Washington, D.C., and at representative
field units--with an emphasis on diverse locations, types of units, and
the operations of each. The study's "Conclusions and Recommendations," presented
in three clear statements, are as true today as they were 50 years ago:
Historically, the Coast Guard is a changing, not a static, organization;
All of the duties/functions performed by the Coast Guard are in the public's
interest; and
No evidence was found that any other Federal Government agency could
perform these functions at lower cost or with greater efficiency.
The 1948 study also found that the most significant problems faced by
the Coast Guard were not of its own making, but were the product of Congressional
activity (or the lack of it). Discussing "principal problems," the
study stated that "Under current required budgetary and appropriations
procedures, the Coast Guard is operating on a type of budget which permits
only short-range operational planning with little or no opportunity to
achieve the efficiency possible with long-range planning.
"The development of a base operating plan and program, with activities
and costs segregated along functional lines, as specified and recommended
in this report, should materially increase the efficiency of the Coast
Guard."
Today's Coast Guard
How much haschanged in the last 50 years? In some respects, very little.
The Coast Guard is still a military organization, involved on every maritime
front throughout the world, and is still the nation's multimission service.
Perhaps some examples of today's Coast Guard will serve to show the significant
variety of its current missions.
The high-endurance cutter Midgett is stationed in Seattle, Wash., and
normally cruises the Alaskan coast in support of international fisheries
regulations. However, Midgett left Seattle on 18 June 1999 and sailed
8,500 miles in 28 days to Pusan, South Korea, as part of the USS Peleliu
Amphibious Ready Group for operations enroute to the Arabian Gulf. In
early 1999, Midgett became a permanent unit of the USS Constellation
Carrier Battle Group, under the command of Cruiser Destroyer Group One--the
first time since World War II that a Coast Guard cutter has been so assigned.
The Midgett and her crew bring unique capabilities to a U.S. Navy Battle
Group, including the skills required for boarding and inspecting vessels
for safety and contraband. Of course, rescue in all of its aspects is
another skill currently being passed on to Navy crews by the Midgett
crew. As Capt. Paul D. Luppert, commanding officer of the Midgett, said, "This
is a chance for the Coast Guard to demonstrate our commitment and showcase
our ability as part of a national asset. We bring a practical side to
the Battle Group with our traditional ability of boarding ships."
Unfortunately, having to deploy for extended periods has produced certain
difficulties for this aged cutter. The Midgett was designed for much
shorter deployments, and to operate at considerably slower cruising speeds
than the Battle Group's usual 20 knots. The higher speed has necessitated
running the turbines constantly, and these ancient 707 aircraft engines
are simply too old and tired for such stress--and there are numerous
unexpected breakdowns as a result. The Midgett's crew has always found
a way to get the turbines running again, and the cutter always met her
commitments.
Maintaining enough fuel and food has been another issue. Because of
her limited carrying capacity the Midgett has needed to take on new supplies,
and to refuel under way, every few days, a complex operation not frequently
practiced by Coast Guard cutters. In spite of the difficulties, the Midgett
and her dedicated crew have performed very well as part of this Navy
team.
On every front today, the Coast Guard is hard at work on a staggering
number, and variety, of missions. For example, Coast Guard C-130 long-range
patrol aircraft are currently patrolling vast areas of the Pacific Ocean
for illegal drift-net fishing. Coast Guard motor lifeboats are saving
lives and protecting property at the entrance to the Columbia River at
Cape Disappointment. USCG drug-interdiction teams operating out of remote
locations in the Caribbean basin are flying HH-60J Jayhawks and HU-25
Falcon aircraft to disrupt the smuggling of drugs into the United States.
Coast Guard marine inspectors board foreign-flag vessels, before they
enter U.S. waters, to ensure their operational safety. Coast Guard Reservists
man small boats and communications sites around and along the nation's
coasts. Coast Guard MH-90 helicopters are now armed, and have proved
very successful in stopping the latest tool of the drug smugglers--the
go-fast boat. (The go-fasts are usually open fiberglass boats, 30 to
45 feet long, equipped with high-powered outboard motors and capable
of carrying a ton of narcotics at speeds in excess of 50 knots; the helicopters,
which work in teams of two with Coast Guard cutters, use their weapons--after
receiving proper authorization--to warn, and then disable, the go-fast
boats by destroying their engines.)
In other words, the Coast Guard of today is performing all of the numerous
missions that the Service has been assigned over the last two centuries,
albeit with a few new tools.
Defining "the Core Business"
Often overlooked in any discussion of the Coast Guard is its unique
ability to perform so many different functions so efficiently. The president
of any private company would be staggered by the task of incorporating
into his or her business the diverse activities that the Coast Guard
undertakes on a daily basis, particularly those that are not part of "the
core business" that defines the company. The question therefore
arises: What is the Coast Guard's core business, and how does one define
it in simple terms?
One perhaps surprising answer that has been suggested is that the Coast
Guard is the nation's "Maritime Primary Care Organization"--because
it is a maritime agency, and is usually the first agency to be called
on to deal with the vast and sometimes bewildering diversity of maritime
issues facing the United States.
The analogy is not all that far-fetched. The Coast Guard installs and
maintains the more than 50,000 aids to navigation around the United States,
but when a mariner chooses the rocks rather than the channel the Coast
Guard is called out to save both his life and his property. The Coast
Guard promulgates numerous regulations for the safe design of vessels,
the licensing of commercial mariners, and the protection of all of the
nation's natural maritime resources--but when an oil spill occurs the
Coast Guard is almost always the first federal agency on the scene, as
well as the last to leave.
The Coast Guard also is tasked to patrol millions of square miles of
open ocean to prevent illegal drift-net fishing--and when an infraction
is discovered, it is the agency that responds. The Coast Guard also is
always ready to respond in the event of a national disaster, such as
Hurricane Floyd.
The Coast Guard's multiplicity of missions poses problems for analysts,
particularly those seeking to measure the Service's cost-effectiveness.
One study determined that the Coast Guard returns $4 in benefits to
the taxpayers for every $1 in Coast Guard appropriations. But, as positive
as the 41 ratio is, it encompasses only a small seg-ment of the
Coast Guard's operations--specifically, the Coast Guard's search-and-rescue
activities. The 41 ratio was developed by comparing the value of
the lives and property saved to the total operational expenses of the
Coast Guard, averaged over five years. But it does not consider the value
of the Coast Guard's drug-interdiction operations, which last year stopped
well over 111,000 pounds of cocaine from entering the United States.
It does not consider the value of LORAN or differential GPS (Global Positioning
System) to navigators (on land and in the air, as well as at sea). It
does not consider the benefits generated from the regulation and licensing
of mariners, and the inspection of both U.S. and foreign-flag vessels
entering and leaving U.S. ports. Nor does it consider the military value
of the Coast Guard to the nation, or the value of those over 50,000 aids
to navigation set and maintained by the Coast Guard, or the dollar value
of the Coast Guard's domestic icebreaking on the Great Lakes and along
the nation's rivers and in U.S. ports and harbors.
The conclusion of the 1948 study was that, "All of the duties/functions
performed by the Coast Guard are in the public's interest." That
statement remains valid and makes it clear that the value of the United
States Coast Guard is quite possibly incalculable, at least in dollars.
It may be appropriate, therefore, to add to the current definition of
the Coast Guard--"Maritime, Military and Multimission"--a few
additional words: "No one does it better, and no one does it for
less."