New type of Navy ship would be a key element
in the Pentagon’s sea basing concept
By MATT HILBURN, Associate Editor
A central challenge of the Pentagon’s
warfighting concept of the future, called sea basing, is to devise
ways to get materiel from cargo-laden transport ships at a sea
base to shore without docking and offloading in the traditional
manner. Operations relevant to the sea base, such as troop staging
and the offloading of weapons, munitions, food and parts for
U.S. troops, would be done about 75 miles at sea.
The challenge becomes all the more vexing in
moderate to high sea states. Some of the Navy’s existing “connector” craft
that would ferry materiel from ship to shore are difficult to
load in all but calm seas.
In its shipbuilding plan for 2007, the Navy
includes a concept for a new type of ship, the Mobile Landing
Platform (MLP), or “floating beach,” that would serve
as the link between transport ships and connectors such as the
Navy Landing Craft, Air Cushion (LCAC).
At the sea base, the MLP would take on cargo
from the huge transports that provide much of the military’s
sealift, and then semi-submerge, creating a floating platform
from which landing craft can pick up cargo and carry it ashore.
The essence of sea basing is that U.S. forces
responding to international crises would no longer establish
beachheads containing mountains of materiel, huge headquarters
and troop staging areas similar to those created in Kuwait in
support of Operation Iraqi Freedom. Beginning in about 2015,
those functions would be moved offshore to a sea base comprised
in part by the Maritime Prepositioning Force (Future), or MPF(F),
a planned squadron of 14 vessels including amphibious ships,
transport vessels and the novel MLP. A planning objective of
the sea basing concept is to move two battalions totaling 2,400
Marines to an objective ashore overnight.
A huge gap in the concept is the lack of connectors,
the ships and aircraft that would rapidly transport troops and
their materiel from the sea base to tactical objectives ashore.
The Navy does not have enough connectors, and those that exist
do not work well with existing transport ships. U.S. forces need
new technologies — or interfaces — that would foster
the rapid transfer of cargo from ship to ship. The purpose of
the MLP concept is to plug part of that gap.
Still in an early developmental stage, the MLP
could be “our pier in the ocean,” said Navy Capt.
Patricia Sudol, program manager for support ships, boats and
craft for the Navy’s program executive office for ships.
The idea for creating an at-sea beach dates
back more than 15 years, according to Dan Wilkins, director of
engineering for CDI Marine, a marine engineering and design company
specializing in ship and boat design and construction.
At that time, tests of the concept involved
the operation of LCACs and the Army’s cushion craft with
barge modules. Later, the idea of building an integrated landing
platform onto cargo ships was tested but, in the end, the transfer
of cargo was slow and costly. Once today’s concept of the
MPF(F) began to take shape, the need for MLP-like capability
was clear.
The basic concept appears simple. An MLP would
side up to a large, roll-on/roll-off ship filled with cargo.
The cargo would be rolled off the ship and onto the MLP. That
cargo could then be loaded onto LCACs, which would quickly ferry
it to shore. Early concepts of the MLP would have it carry up
to six LCACs.
Quickly transferring cargo from ship to ship
while in heavy seas poses numerous challenges, such as how to
compensate for the relative motion between two differently sized
ships, how to account for high winds, and how to conduct different
offloads safely and efficiently when some of the cargo is simultaneously
being taken ashore via aircraft. Industry is already working
to tackle these issues.
“We’re actively developing solutions
for the MLP,” said Barbara Garrow, a spokeswoman for Maersk
Line Limited, a global provider of logistics, maritime and transportation
services to the government.
Sudol said the MLP also will be interoperable
with the Joint High Speed Vessel, a future high-speed ship that
would haul troops, equipment and cargo between large ships and
small ports with limited access.
The MLP is to be the only newly designed ship
for the MPF(F), and the Navy and Marine Corps have only notional
ideas of what it would look like. The MPF(F) squadron would comprise
three MLPs, along with two LHA Replacement large-deck amphibious
ships, one LHD large-deck amphibious ship, three T-AKE cargo
ships, three Large/Medium Speed Roll-on/Roll-off cargo ships
and two legacy maritime prepositioning ships taken from existing
squadrons.
MPF(F) ships will be capable of prepositioning
critical equipment and 20 days of supplies for a future Marine
Expeditionary Brigade. According to the Marine Corps’ directory, “Concepts
+ Programs 2006,” an MLP would be operated at speeds up
to 20 knots by a crew of 64, and contain approximately 1,500
berths.
“MLP will provide an independent interface
between transport ships and surface connectors such as [LCACs]
and the future sea-base-to-shore connector,” Sudol said. “For
joint operations, MLP represents a potential universal interface
for Navy and Army ships and small craft.”
The MLP also could be used to transport causeway
sections, berthing barges, containers and additional LCACs.
Last October, the MLP concept was tested off
the coast of San Diego and in Puget Sound, Wash. Acting in the
role of the MLP, the demonstration utilized the Military Sealift
Command-chartered heavy lift ship MV Mighty Servant I, and the
USNS Watkins served as the Large/Medium Speed Roll-on/Roll-off
ship.
During the first test, which took place at Puget
Sound, the two ships moored together while at anchor in calm
waters. Cargo was then moved back and forth between the two ships
using the Watkins’ side ramp.
The second phase, which took place off San Diego,
demonstrated the ability to load cargo from the Mighty Servant
I to LCACs, which could then ferry the cargo ashore.
First construction for the MLP tentatively is
scheduled in fiscal year 2009.