"Citizens in Support of the Sea Services"

spacer 150 pixels
spacer 150 pixels
 


 


Back to Main Seapower Archives
Archives

Controlling the Undersea Battlespace in the Littorals

By JON P. WALMAN

Jon P. Walman is a former U.S. Navy surface warfare and antisubmarine warfare officer. He currently works as a defense contractor for the Techmatics Division of Anteon Corporation in
Arlington, Va.


 

"Damn the torpedos, full speed ahead!"

The courageous words uttered by Admiral David Farragut during the battle for Mobile Bay capture the challenge the U.S. Navy faces in designing and developing its next-generation surface combatants to operate in contested waters despite the threat of mines, diesel-electric submarines, and other coastal defenses.

The Navy's Land-Attack Destroyer, DD-21, is the first class in a planned "family" of 21st-century surface combatants. Acting independently or as an integral part of a naval, joint, or combined task force, DD-21 will carry out land-attack and maritime-dominance (sea-control) missions while operating primarily in littoral regions. A fundamental requirement for achieving maritime dominance--be it near shore or in the open ocean--involves controlling what is under the sea. The Navy plans to meet the complex undersea-warfare challenges of the 21st-century in large part through the advanced technology being developed for DD-21's Integrated Undersea Warfare (IUSW-21) program, which is focused on controlling the undersea battlespace, particularly in the littorals.

Littoral Threats And Environmental Challenges

Diesel-electric submarines, and sea mines of all types, are the two most prevalent of today's undersea threats--and perhaps the most difficult to counter--according to Paul Stevens, IUSW-21 technology manager.

"Modern diesel submarines, such as the Russian-built Kilo class and the German-built Type 209 and 212 classes, use advanced battery designs and air-independent propulsion, enabling them to operate with low radiated noise and relatively high submerged endurance," he said. "These factors, coupled with their low active acoustic target strength and low doppler [i.e., opening or closing rates], make them very difficult to detect.

"On the other hand, detecting mines, especially bottom and buried mines, is challenging because of their small size, odd shapes, and construction of special materials and coatings."

DD-21 will be the first U.S. Navy surface combatant specifically designed to operate against undersea threats in the complex and dynamic littoral environment. Among the principal factors limiting littoral USW (undersea warfare) threat detection are the shallow water depth, variations in water temperature, the ambient noise created by shipping and biologics, acoustic reverberations, debris or "clutter" on the ocean bottom (which causes a high rate of "false" contacts), and the inherently irregular contours of the bottom itself.

DD-21 Acquisition Plan

Under the current phase of DD-21 acquisition, two competing industry teams are developing total ship system concepts without predetermined subsystem boundaries or constraints. This acquisition strategy empowers industry to make "trade space" decisions that optimize cost and performance at the ship level.

The Navy plans to evaluate industry proposals in fiscal year 2001 and select the total ship system solution that best satisfies DD-21 operational requirements--within established cost and performance criteria. Prior to selecting the winning industry team, the Navy will continue to develop advanced technologies that support its notional IUSW-21 concept; the winning contractor will be free to use any of the technologies developed during this phase of the program.

Industry decisions related to the development of proposed USW system concepts are guided principally by the need to meet DD-21 total ownership cost goals and the following top-level DD-21 program objectives:

  • A procurement cost of $750 million (in FY 1996 dollars) for the fifth ship built at each of the participating shipyards;
  • Operating and support costs of $2,700 per hour underway (this is 70 percent less than the hourly underway cost to run an Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer); and
  • A manning level of 95 people, including helicopter detachment.

In addition, the Navy said, DD-21 must meet the following USW-related operational requirements:

  • Submarine detection/engagement;
  • Torpedo defense;
  • On-board (in-stride) mine detection/avoidance;
  • Off-board mine reconnaissance;
  • Survivability;
  • Signature reduction;
  • Aviation mission support; and
  • Interoperability with off-board USW sensors, models, and databases.

Major Technical And Operational Challenges

One of industry's most important technical challenges is to engineer USW functionality into the DD-21 total ship system architecture, according to Stevens.

"The USW system must be fully integrated into the ship's combat system to support DD-21 performance, manning, and overall life-cycle cost objectives. The scope of this integration includes operators, maintainers, hardware, software, and connectivity with other theater assets," he said.

Stevens sees potential for reducing USW manning by developing technology for broadband signal processing, data fusion, environmental adaptation, and the automated detection-classification-localization of undersea threats.

"We must clearly reduce the number of people dedicated to USW operations aboard DD-21," he said. He noted, by way of comparison, that 20 sonar technicians (in a crew of 300 personnel) are required to operate and maintain the AN/SQQ-89(V)6 USW system installed in an Arleigh Burke-class DDG.

IUSW-21 and Ancillary Systems

The IUSW-21 program is a risk-reduction effort to develop and demonstrate advanced technologies for potential transfer to DD-21 industry design teams. The goal of this DD-21 "associated system" is to minimize the risks involved in meeting DD-21 USW requirements. However, the competing "Blue and Gold" teams are ultimately responsible "for developing DD-21 USW system concepts," said Stevens.

According to Stevens, the current focus of IUSW-21 investments are intended to:

  • Improve USW performance in shallow water by demonstrating a lightweight variable-depth transmitter and broadband signal processing;
  • Reduce USW manning by developing technology for broadband signal processing, automated detection-classification-localization, data fusion, and environmental adaptation;
  • Provide in-stride mine detection and avoidance capabilities through the use of organic (on-board) sensors; and
  • Develop concepts to minimize impact on the DD-21 preliminary hull design by studies focused on, for example, variable-depth sonar, multiple towed bodies, and conformal-array technology.

While these technology investments are being pursued by a variety of organizations funded by the DD-21 Program Office (PMS 500), the overall IUSW-21 program is being managed by an IUSW-21 "peer group."

"We recognize that ... [the nation's] undersea warfare expertise is broadly dispersed across academia, Navy and university laboratories, small businesses, and industry," Stevens explained. The peer group, he said, represents all of these sectors, and provides the means of focusing the collective expertise in a synergistic way. "Our peer group structure," he said, "enhances our technology development process by making the latest information available to the entire USW community in a timely way, eliminating barriers between organizations, considering technical issues from different viewpoints, and providing the best ideas and solutions from across the community."

Network-Centric USW And Combined Arms

DD-21 will incorporate the basic tenets of the Navy's Network Centric Warfare vision. Technological advances in collecting, processing, and networking information among disparate sensors and "shooters" (i.e., weapon systems) promise broad war-fighting improvements at the tactical, operational, and strategic levels of warfare.

The Network Centric Warfare concept is based on the principle that information superiority--resulting primarily from the creation, accumulation, and control of battlespace information--translates directly into combat power. This particular form of power is expressed in speed of command, accuracy of information, and adaptability to changing operational and environmental conditions. In short, the goal of Network Centric Warfare is to mass "effects," rather than platforms.

A network-centric USW vision is outlined in the Navy's 1998 ASW Focus Statement: "With declining defense budgets, a combined-arms approach that integrates our ASW systems and sensors into a network-centric architecture is imperative. Equally important is the reliance we will place on working with our allies in refining a combined operational approach to ASW."

On its Far-Term (ASW) Action list, the Navy plans to implement Network Centric Warfare by, among other things:

  • The development of networked search techniques that integrate acoustic as well as nonacoustic systems and sensors;
  • The adaptation of operators, sensors, and weapons to the local acoustic environment in real time;
  • Linking sensors and shooters into a common, combined-arms network;
  • Sharing a common and coherent tactical picture, including environmental factors, with other fleet and force assets; and
  • Building future platforms with rapid sensor-upgrade capabilities--achieved in large part through the use of industry-standard packaging and common architectures.

The achievement of environmental adaptivity serves as one example of how DD-21 may apply the Network Centric Warfare concept to undersea operations. To a certain extent, DD-21 will be expected to automatically recommend and adapt the combat system configuration that most effectively and expeditiously optimizes its performance in a specific environment. This adaptivity will address changes to sensor configuration and placement, processing, the display of information, and the employment of tactics.

At the operational level, the Navy and its sister services are working to develop and implement cooperative USW tactics, techniques, and procedures through a "combined arms" approach aimed at sharing data and information more effectively among the sensors and weapon systems deployed to any given theater. This same integrated team approach is also being increasingly applied in the policy directives and operational practices of Navy-Marine Corps-Joint mine warfare forces.

In summary, the challenge of controlling the littoral undersea battlespace is critical to naval, joint, and combined warfighting effectiveness. Clearly the U.S. Navy must modernize its undersea warfare capabilities in order to adapt to complex littoral environments and to keep pace with the rapid advances in and proliferation of submarine, torpedo, and mine threats throughout the world. Incorporating IUSW-21 advanced technologies and applying new operational concepts, like that envisioned by Network Centric Warfare, will help meet the operational requirements not only of the Navy's next-generation surface combatant, DD-21, but also of other future ship types and classes.

 



Back to Main Seapower Archives
Archives

Go to next article:

A Fundamental Shift in the Business of Warfighting

 

 

spacer 150 pixels

Navy League of the United States
2300 Wilson Boulevard Arlington, VA 22201-3308
703.528.1775
FAX 703.528.2333
Our switchboard is open 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Time), 
Monday-Friday.




managed and maintained by:
CTDS Online Web Solutions