By LOREN B.
THOMPSON
Loren B. Thompson directs the defense studies program of the Lexington Institute and
teaches in the National Securities Studies Program at Georgetown University.

So uncharted is the national security landscape in the first decade following the end of
Cold War that the Pentagon has declared "uncertainty" the enemy. What is clearly
known is the effect this uncertainty has had on U.S. defense planning. Since 1989, the
U.S. defense budget has been cut by more than a third--as has been the size of the U.S.
military. Today's smaller force has scarcely had a moment to relax in what had been
predicted to be an era of "strategic pause." Instead, it has experienced an
unusually high operational tempo as it has swung between missions across the spectrum of
warfare--from strikes against terrorists to peacekeeping to forward presence to deterrence
of renewed conflict against such foes as Iraq and North Korea. The resultant demands on
the smaller but more widely used post-Cold War force have driven the U.S. military to
embrace the concept of "efficiency" like never before.
That has been a challenge. The problem is
determining how to meet the widest range of possible missions with a smaller,
budget-restrained force largely based in the United States. The operational burden has
fallen disproportionately on the forward-deployed Navy and Marine Corps, primarily because
the waning of America's Cold-War alliances and overseas network of ground and air bases
has necessarily shifted much of the U.S. global force-projection mission to sea-based
forces. The two sea services are continuously searching for creative ways to accomplish
their growing responsibilities both efficiently and expeditiously.
Fortunately, the Pentagon already has in
hand a key tool to help meet that challenge, even though planners do not seem to have yet
fully recognized its potential. That "tool" is the V-22 Osprey--the
revolutionary new tilt-rotor aircraft that can take off and land like a helicopter and fly
long distances at high speeds like a fixed-wing aircraft. The Pentagon thus has in one
airframe an aircraft that can replace a costly variety of single-mission helicopters and
fixed-wing aircraft while meeting the rapidly expanding spectrum of traditional and new
mission requirements that mark the uncertain post-Cold War era.
Effectiveness and Survivability
The "V" in V-22 is military
shorthand for "vertical"--but it would just as accurately be translated as
"versatile," thanks to the Osprey's ability to efficiently carry out the broad
range of real-world missions facing the U.S. military today. Several specific missions
already are planned for the V-22, but the plane's unique combinations of speed, range, and
flexibility suggest that those might be only the beginning.
In the lead as the largest single
purchaser of V-22s under the Pentagon's current buying plan is the Marine Corps, which is
heavily committed to the Osprey because of the theaterwide flexibility inherent in the
tiltrotor design. By 2001, Marine Corps Air Station New River, N.C., is projected to have
a full V-22 squadron, VMMT-204, up and running. The Marine Corps plans to buy 360 V-22
Ospreys, replacing all of its dangerously aged CH-46 twin-rotor helicopters, most of which
entered service before the pilots who fly them were born.
The principal mission for which the V-22
is now being purchased is to carry combat-loaded Marines swiftly and safely from ships at
sea to landing sites ashore. Because of the exponential increase in capability it provides
over the slower and more vulnerable helicopters now assigned to that mission, the Osprey
will substantially boost the Marine Corps' combat effectiveness--and the survivability of
its ground forces. With the Osprey, Marines will be able to sortie from sea-based ships
stationed at greater distances offshore, well outside the range of increasingly lethal
enemy antiship missiles. They also will be able to close faster on the landing zones of
tomorrow's battlefields --which will be deeper into enemy territory than previously could
be reached via helicopter.
The U.S. Special Operations Command also
has recognized the Osprey's speed and range advantages over helicopters. The Air Force
Special Operations Command (AFSOC) intends to buy 50 CV-22Bs by 2010. Modified and armed
for covert night-time infiltration and exfiltration missions, the CV-22s will replace
three different AFSOC platforms: MH-53J Pave Low and MH-60G Blackhawk helicopters, and
some MC-130 fixed-wing transport and refueling planes. AFSOC will use the V-22 not only
for combat search and rescue, for which the CV-22 is particularly well-suited, but also
for other missions ranging from strikes against terrorists to the evacuation of
noncombatants from U.S. embassies overseas to direct-action and hostage-rescue operations.
Serious Cost Savings
Rounding out the U.S. military's
currently planned Osprey purchase, the Navy plans to field about 48 HV-22Bs, which will be
equipped to rescue pilots shot down at sea (Navy variant of the previously mentioned
combat search-and-rescue mission). Navy V-22s also will transport Navy SEAL units for
special-warfare strike, intelligence, and reconnaissance missions, and carry out certain
fleet logistics tasks, such as the vertical replenishment of ships underway. Because of
the V-22's sizable cargo bay, it also can be easily pressed into service as an
aerial-refueling platform for carrier- and amphibious ship-based Navy and Marine Corps
aircraft.
The Pentagon's current multiservice
Osprey buying plan, a total of some 458 V-22s, looks impressive. But when the versatility
of the V-22 is matched against other existing demands on the Defense Department, and with
the requirement for increases in military efficiency and cost effectiveness factored in,
it becomes evident, Osprey proponents say, that a larger purchase should be seriously
considered.
From Coast Guard rescue missions to Army
medevac and air assault, the V-22 can replace even more helicopters and planes than now
planned. That would lower procurement costs, increase commonality, and boost multiservice
cooperation around a single flexible platform.
Although the first V-22s are only now
entering regular military service, Osprey can hardly be called a new program. On 4 June
1982, the Army, Navy, and Air Force agreed to cooperate in the development of what was
then called a Joint-Services Advanced Vertical-Lift Aircraft. Early plans called for 1,100
of the aircraft to be built. In 1986, the Pentagon awarded a contract to the teamed Bell
and Boeing helicopter companies to build the first six prototype V-22s.
The first Osprey flew on Sunday, 19 March
1989; in December 1990 it went to sea for shipboard testing aboard the amphibious warship
USS Wasp. Defense Secretary Dick Cheney tried several times to kill the program, saying
the Pentagon could not afford such a revolutionary plane at a time, in the wake of the
Cold War, when the defense budget was declining annually. Congress balked at Cheney's
cutback attempt, and the Bush Administration relented in its waning months. The Clinton
Administration has supported the program, and in late 1994 awarded contracts for more
V-22s; almost a dozen have been built to date. So far, testers have accumulated more than
1,200 hours of flight testing in over 1,000 separate flights.
The Threshold of Success
The V-22 has met or exceeded all its
requirements to date. In fact, it is currently about 800 pounds beneath its planned empty
weight--a key threshold that often presents problems to aircraft designers.
This progress indicates that the V-22
should with little difficulty meet the challenge of taking on missions beyond those
already planned for the Marine Corps and Navy, and the Air Force's Special Operations
Command. V-22s provide the qualities of agility and mission adaptability traditionally
sought by Special Operations Forces (SOF), remarks Rey Maduro Sr., head of Research
Planning Inc., a company with long involvement in the special ops field. Special
Operations planners seek every opportunity to leverage service-common platforms and
systems that can be modified for SOF mission requirements. The V-22 seems to its
supporters, in Congress as well as the military, to be an excellent example of a
cost-effective and versatile platform that might easily be adapted for other missions.
Because it already is destined for
service with the Air Force as a special operations platform, there would be little
modification required for the V-22 to serve the Army in the same role. Today, the Army
relies upon twin-rotor MH-47E Chinooks and modified MH-60K Blackhawks for the insertion
and recovery of special operations troops. Just as the Air Force plans to replace its
MH-53Js and MH-60Gs with the V-22, the Army could without difficulty do likewise. Because
of its much greater speed and range, the V-22 could provide a higher sortie rate for
night-time SOF raids than can conventional rotorcraft, according to a 1990 study by the
Institute for Defense Analysis.
Meeting the Medevac Need
The V-22's internal cargo space, big
enough to accommodate 24 combat-equipped special operations or conventional troops, also
could carry 12 litters, making the Osprey an optimal medevac transport for the Army. It
is, perhaps, this role which is most compelling. The V-22 could land vertically to pick up
wounded soldiers, then transport them at high speed for surgical treatment. Studies
carried out during the Vietnam War showed that survival from combat trauma increases in
inverse proportion to the time it takes to get a wounded soldier to a field hospital.
Replacing standard Army UH-60s with V-22s for the medevac role could save numerous lives
on tomorrow's battlefields.
The Osprey also can fulfill another
important Army requirement: air assault. Today, the 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault)
relies upon a mix of CH-47D and UH-60 helicopters to transport soldiers into landing zones
in the enemy's rear, a mission that is similar in most respects to the ship-to-shore lift
for which the Marine Corps is purchasing its MV-22s.
The 101st conducted a real-world air
assault as recently as 1991, during the Persian Gulf War. If executed with V-22s, that
airlift could have allowed the division to begin combat operations much farther from the
Iraqi lines, greatly decreasing the chance of detection. A faster closure rate on the
landing-zone objective also enhances in-air survivability against the increasing
proliferation of man-portable air-defense missiles. Moreover, the V-22's greater
range--480 nautical miles--significantly stretches the reach of air assault troops over
that which can currently be achieved solely with helicopters.
Like the Marines, Army troops stand to
benefit from the greater survivability afforded by the V-22. The V-22's acoustic signature
at cruise speed and altitude is only a fraction of that of conventional helicopters.
Analysts say, in fact, that because of the V-22's greater speed and reduced acoustic
signature an enemy would have only about one-eighth the audible warning time provided by
standard helicopters.
"A More Cost-Effective
Force"
It is not only intra-theater medical or
air-assault lift that could be carried out by V-22s. Indeed, one of the plane's greatest
strengths is its ability to self-deploy from the United States. As the U.S. military
increasingly refashions itself into a CONUS-based force, less reliant on forward bases,
the V-22 could speed the dispatch of U.S.-based forces directly into semipermissive and/or
semisecure landing zones overseas. In that respect, the V-22 would be an ideal platform
for the Air Force's newly announced restructuring into 10 Air Expeditionary Forces poised
for rapid deployment.
The Pentagon may not be the only
beneficiary of the V-22's versatility. The Coast Guard and other federal law-enforcement
agencies operate an assortment of aircraft for various rescue and surveillance missions.
The Coast Guard's rescue-at-sea missions are today carried out primarily by conventional
helicopters. The V-22 is twice as fast as the USCG's helicopters, and has more range,
arguably making it better suited for such missions.
The Pentagon's current plan to purchase
458 Ospreys is the strongest endorsement of the versatile tiltrotor to date. Those Ospreys
will provide the Marine Corps, Navy, and Air Force Special Operations Command with strong
increases in capability over several different types of helicopters and fixed-wing
aircraft now in the inventory. But today's buying plan does not extend the V-22 Osprey's
range of capabilities to other DOD components that now are forced to rely on older and
less capable equipment. With the nation's service chiefs and the defense committees in
Congress agreed on the need for a more cost-effective force, the Osprey's advantages in
speed and range over the existing mix of helicopters and fixed-wing planes distributed
throughout the U.S. military argues for a reconsideration, at least, of the current
acquisition plan.
|