| By GORDON I. PETERSON, Senior Editor
President Clinton has signed into
law a massive omnibus government spending package, following protracted efforts by the
House and Senate to avoid a government shutdown by finalizing its eight spending bills, an
emergency aid package, and several government authorizing bills. A total of $8.5 billion
in additional national defense funding for fiscal year 1999 was included in the measure,
with $7.7 billion allocated for Department of Defense (DOD) activities, $210 million for
the U.S. Coast Guard, and $525 million for Department of Energy nuclear activities.
The 21 October signing of the omnibus
package followed the president's 17 October signing of the FY 1999 defense appropriations
bill, which provides $250.5 billion in spending authority for the current fiscal year.
Clinton also signed the "Strom Thurmond" National Defense Authorization Act for
FY 1999 into law in October, providing a funding level for new budget authority of $270.5
billion--$2.6 billion below the inflation-adjusted FY 1998 spending level.
Days before the 105th Congress adjourned,
Rep. Bob Livingston (R-La.), then chairman of the House Appropriations Committee (and soon
to be the new Speaker of the House), claimed that the omnibus bill began "... a
process of reversing a dangerous 10-year decline in defense spending."
Of the $7.7 billion earmarked for DOD in
the omnibus emergency-supplemental bill, $1.1 billion will target urgent readiness-funding
shortfalls publicized during Congressional hearings in September and October. This plus-up
for DOD-wide readiness accounts will fund additional flying hours, spare parts, depot
maintenance, and personnel recruiting and retention initiatives. The Congressional defense
supplemental funding bill also provides:
- $1.9 billion for ongoing contingency
operations in Bosnia;
- $1.1 billion for Year 2000 computer
requirements;
- $1 billion for ballistic missile
defense;
- $42 million for counterdrug and
drug-interdiction activities;
- $200 million for security
improvements in U.S. diplomatic facilities overseas;
- $50 million for antiterrorism
programs;
- $200 million for medical-care issues
affecting military members and families; and
- $260 million for facility repairs
needed because of hurricane and storm damage.
Cohen: A Down Payment
The week after his 7 October
appearance on Capitol Hill to testify on military readiness, Secretary of Defense William
S. Cohen made a seven-day, six-country visit to Southwest Asia. His trip included a 9
October stop on board the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln
during the ship's operations in the Arabian Gulf.
Referring to the Congressional action to
plus-up the FY 1999 military readiness accounts by $1 billion, Cohen said the funding
increase is only a start at correcting readiness deficiencies. "We have tried to
indicate to all concerned that's only a down payment, and that we ... [have] to address
other shortfalls," Cohen told U.S. service members in the Gulf region.
Later, appearing with Sen. Trent Lott
(R-Miss.), Senate Majority Leader, at a tribute to the armed forces in Biloxi, Miss., on
19 October, Cohen again maintained that the supplemental bill's add-on to FY 1999 DOD
spending represents only a down payment on overall U.S. defense-funding requirements.
"We've got to look at ways in which we can raise that top line to a level that will
make sure that we keep the forces that we have today in the best fighting condition that
they can possibly be, and we are going to work on that," Cohen said. In his Biloxi
speech the defense secretary also called for further increases in defense-procurement
funding (to a total of $60 billion annually), improvements in military compensation, and
revision of the current military retirement system.
The DOD FY 1999 appropriations bill
funds a force structure of 1.3 million active-duty personnel. A military pay raise of 3.6
percent was fully funded--$202 million over the president's request for a 3.1 percent pay
hike. Late efforts to change the "Redux" reduced retirement system (which
adversely affects service members who joined the military after 31 July 1986) were
unsuccessful.
Plus-ups Benefit Navy
Operational Readiness
The U.S. Navy's share of FY 1999
readiness-funding increases falls far short of the $6 billion requirement identified by
Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Jay L. Johnson when he testified to Congress on 29
September. (See Sea Power, November 1998, page 22.) However, a senior Navy official
noted that the final versions of the DOD appropriations and authorization bills, together
with the omnibus package's supplemental funding, will directly benefit the Navy's
operating forces. Department of the Navy defense and military construction funding in the
defense supplemental appropriation totaled $520 million, with $340.5 million identified
for readiness enhancements in the military personnel and operations/maintenance accounts.
Congress approved the Navy's FY
1999 end strength of 372,696 personnel contained in the president's budget request. Navy
appropriations for FY 1999 include:
- $16.6 billion for active-duty
personnel;
- $1.4 billion for Naval Reserve
personnel;
- $21.9 billion for operations and
maintenance;
- $957.2 million for Naval Reserve
operations and maintenance; and
- $274.6 million for environmental
restoration.
During finalization of the FY 1999
defense authorization bill, House and Senate conferees expressed alarm over the overall
decline in modernization funding for the Department of the Navy. "Of particular
concern," the conferees reported, "was the disparity between the Navy's ship
force structure requirements and the funding available for the recapitalization of the
shipbuilding account."
Navy acquisition programs fared
well overall in FY 1999. Following, for selected programs, are some of the highlights in
the final budget plan:
- V-22 Osprey tiltrotor aircraft:
seven aircraft fully funded;
- CH-60 helicopters: five
aircraft (one more than the president's budget request);
- Joint Strike Fighter: president's
budget request fully funded (and a $15 million plus-up added);
- F-18E/F strike fighter aircraft:
30 aircraft (but a reduction of $14 million);
- CVN-77 nuclear-powered aircraft
carrier: fully funded advanced procurement in president's budget request;
- DDG-51 guided-missile destroyer:
fully funded president's request for three ships;
- LPD-18 amphibious transport dock
ship: fully funded president's request for one ship;
- NSSN new attack submarine:
fully funded the president's budget request for one boat;
- DD-21 land-attack destroyer:
program funded (but an $8.6 million reduction in live-fire and testing funds);
- Theater Ballistic Missile Defense:
fully funded the president's budget request (and a $120 million plus-up added);
- Cooperative-Engagement Capability:
fully funded president's budget request (with plus-ups of $26 million in research and
development, and $35 million in procurement, also added);
- Aircraft spares: fully funded
president's budget request (and plus-up of $35 million added);
- Ship depot maintenance: fully
funded the president's budget request (and plus-up of $45 million added); and
- Base support: fully funded
the president's budget request.
The Navy was less successful in
other areas. Congressional authorizers approved $110 million for the CVX next-generation
aircraft carrier--$80 million below the president's budget request--and appropriators
funded the program at $105 million. The vertical gun for advanced ships (VGAS) was funded
at $15.2 million, a $10 million reduction. The $27.1 million requested for the Common
Support Aircraft was zeroed out, a major setback that will delay the program indefinitely.
The multiyear procurement sought for several big-ticket hardware programs was approved
only for the E-2C Hawkeye early-warning aircraft.
Marine Corp Programs Fare
Well in Final Procurement
The Marine Corps also fared well
legislatively with the 105th Congress, with the FY 1999 Defense Appropriations Act
providing approximately $11 billion in funding. A Marine spokesman characterized the funds
allocated as a "fair share," but noted that additional funds are still needed
for equipment modernization--notwithstanding plus-ups to Marine Corps accounts totaling
nearly $293 million above the president's budget request. Active-duty Marine Corps end
strength is set at 172,200. Marine Corps funding in the FY 1999 spending bill includes:
- $6.3 billion for active-duty
personnel;
- $406.6 million for reserve
personnel;
- $2.6 billion for operations and
maintenance;
- $117.9 million for Marine Corps
reserve operations and maintenance;
- $370.3 million for research,
development, test, and evaluation; and
- $108 million for military
construction.
Plus-ups to Navy acquisition
accounts directly supporting the Marine Corps include $112.4 million for two KC-130
Hercules refueling and transport aircraft, $16.0 million for the LCAC (landing craft air
cushion) service-life extension program, and $45 million in advance procurement funding
for an additional amphibious assault ship of the LHD-1 Wasp class.
Multiyear procurement for the AV-8B
Harrier VSTOL (vertical/short takeoff and landing) aircraft was supported by Senate and
House authorization bill conferees, but was not approved in the report accompanying the
DOD FY 1999 appropriations bill.
During his 29 September testimony
on Marine Corps readiness before the Senate Armed Services Committee, USMC Commandant Gen.
Charles C. Krulak estimated that an additional $1.5 billion would be needed to meet the
Corps' current modernization requirements. The FY 1999 Defense Supplemental Appropriations
folded into the omnibus spending package added funding of $60.9 million for Marine Corps
operations and maintenance, $3.3 million for Marine Corps Reserve operations and
maintenance, $11.9 million for Marine Corps personnel, and $2.5 million to repair storm
damage at Marine Corps facilities in North Carolina.
Secretary of Defense Cohen met with
Marines stationed at Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii, on 30 October during a scheduled week-long trip
to Asia that was cut short by renewed tensions with Iraq. According to the American Forces
Information Service (AFIS), the Hawaii-based Marines did not hold back, telling Cohen they
need new aircraft, spare parts, and equipment.
AFIS reported that Cohen had
acknowledged that concerns over shortfalls in spares and equipment--which have direct
consequences for readiness and morale--were raised during all of his visits to defense
installations in recent months. The defense secretary said that recent DOD funding
increases should begin to "flow through" during the next few months. Cohen also
pledged to work closely with Congress during the next two months to obtain targeted pay
increases as well as reforms to the retirement system. The results of his efforts would be
reflected in the FY 2000 DOD budget proposal.
Coast Guard Receives $4.3
Billion for FY 1999
The FY 1999 omnibus spending bill
signed also provides $4.3 billion for the Coast Guard in FY 1999. Coast Guard officials,
faced earlier in the year with the possibility of drastic funding reductions, were clearly
relieved that the final spending bill ensures that the USCG's current level of services
can be maintained during the year ahead. Additional funds for drug interdiction and
operational readiness that were included in the FY 1999 supplemental appropriations will
be the key to allowing the Coast Guard to maintain current services.
All Coast Guard mission areas were
enhanced by the addition of modest funding increases for cutters, boats, aircraft, and
equipment. According to a Coast Guard spokesman, the supplemental plus-ups for
drug-interdiction operations will allow the service to continue its implementation of the
"Steel Web" strategy to deny narcotic smugglers easy access to transit and
arrival zones.
The supplemental funding also will
allow adequate funding for Coast Guard personnel and sufficient enlistments to fill the
existing personnel shortfall. Coast Guard officials predict that the Coast Guard Reserve
will be brought up to its authorized strength with the increased drill rates. The
spokesman said that the added funding also benefits the active force, given the use of
Coast Guard reserve personnel not only for emergency missions but also for the service's
day-to-day operations.
Top Navy Officials Confirmed
Following Senate confirmation,
several top civilian officials assumed senior leadership positions in the Department of
the Navy in recent months, led by Richard J. Danzig's assumption of duty as secretary of
the Navy on 16 November. (See Sea Power, November 1998, page 19.) The other
appointees are:
- Stephen W. Preston, general counsel
of the Navy.
- Lee Buchanan III, assistant
secretary of the Navy for research, development, and acquisition.
- Carolyn Howland Becraft, assistant
secretary of the Navy for manpower and reserve affairs.
- Charles P. Nemfakos, acting
assistant secretary of the Navy for financial management and comptroller.
Military Retirement: Murtha Vows to "Fight Hard"
for Change
"Congressional leaders missed a
golden opportunity to do something important for members of the armed forces when they
rejected my proposal to restore equity to the military retirement system." That is
how Rep. John P. Murtha (D-Pa.) assessed his unsuccessful effort, during the final weeks
of the 105th Congress, to revise the "Redux" retirement system.
Murtha, a Marine Corps and Vietnam
veteran, spearheaded the charge to respond to a top Joint Chiefs of Staff priority aimed
at restoring retired pay to 50 percent of average base pay after 20 years of military
service. Retention trends are down, and the service chiefs all point to the revised
retirement system as a growing source of discontent among career personnel. The Redux
plan, which has been in place for over 12 years, reduced the 20-year retired compensation
to 40 percent for service members who entered the armed forces after 31 July 1986. Annual
cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) also are reduced under the Redux plan, but Murtha's
scheme would not have restored full COLA.
House and Senate Republican leaders
rebuffed the proposal to modify the retirement plan in 1999, asserting that additional
study and Congressional hearings are needed to explore issues fully. Some defense analysts
oppose wholesale revisions to the less costly Redux retirement system. The Newport News
Daily Press reported on 30 October that Robert Emmerichs, an architect of the Redux
plan during his work with the late Defense Secretary Les Aspin, advocates more robust
bonuses targeted at needed skill areas.
Murtha, the Ranking Minority Member of
the National Security Subcommittee of the House Appropriations Committee, told Sea
Power that Congress had the chance to send a strong and clear message to military
members and their families that their service is valued. "The one million active
service members who entered after July 31, l986, are just now coming to understand that
they will receive close to 25 percent fewer lifetime benefits than personnel who entered
the service before August 1, 1986," Murtha said. The Pennsylvanian lawmaker said the
change to a less generous retirement plan had caused heavy resentment among the service
people he met during visits in 1998 to the Persian Gulf, Bosnia, South Korea, and Okinawa.
Despite the near-term legislative setback
on the retirement plan, Murtha noted some progress. "The White House has assured me
that they will include my retirement reform initiative in the FY 2000 president's budget
coming out early next year," Murtha said.
During an interview with Armed Forces
Radio and Television on 22 October, Defense Secretary William S. Cohen and Joint Chiefs of
Staff Chairman Gen. Henry H. Shelton said that the Department of Defense will work hard
during the year ahead to remedy current pay and retirement problems. "It was very
beneficial to us that we have more time in which we can work our way through how we are
going to allocate the pay increase and retirement benefit change," Cohen said.
"It's important to get it done not only quickly, but to get it done right."
Murtha offered an equally positive
outlook. "I expect that we will make important strides in the coming year to address
these needs, and I intend to work very hard to ensure that Congress steps up to the
plate," he said.
|